Search results for " and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement"

showing 4 items of 4 documents

Le paradoxe du seuil de pauvreté endogène dans les indices de pauvreté

2007

JEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D6 - Welfare Economics/D.D6.D63 - Equity Justice Inequality and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D3 - Distribution/D.D3.D31 - Personal Income Wealth and Their DistributionsJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D3 - Distribution/D.D3.D31 - Personal Income Wealth and Their DistributionsJEL : I - Health Education and Welfare/I.I3 - Welfare Well-Being and Poverty/I.I3.I32 - Measurement and Analysis of PovertyJEL: I - Health Education and Welfare/I.I3 - Welfare Well-Being and Poverty/I.I3.I32 - Measurement and Analysis of PovertyJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D6 - Welfare Economics/D.D6.D63 - Equity Justice Inequality and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
researchProduct

Justice et inégalités: un amendement à la théorie de John Rawls

1992

National audience; On se demande si les principes de justice de Rawls ne sont pas exagérément inégalitaires, malgré leur côté "juste". On examine donc ce qu'il advient de l'optimum de Rawls, le maximin, quand de l'aversion pour l'inégalité" apparaît. Le maximin consiste à se placer sur un certain point de la courbe d'efficience, en admettant une certaine dose d'inégalité, pourvu que l'on donne le maximum possible aux plus défavorisés. On tient compte d'externalités en reprenant la notion d'envie sous la forme d'une aversion pour l'inégalité, essentiellement de la part des plus défavorisés. On ne peut plus raisonner sur la courbe frontière des rémunérations possibles et on démontre la validi…

JEL: I - Health Education and Welfare/I.I3 - Welfare Well-Being and Poverty/I.I3.I31 - General Welfare Well-BeingJEL: H - Public Economics/H.H2 - Taxation Subsidies and Revenue/H.H2.H23 - Externalities • Redistributive Effects • Environmental Taxes and SubsidiesJEL : I - Health Education and Welfare/I.I3 - Welfare Well-Being and Poverty/I.I3.I31 - General Welfare Well-BeingJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D6 - Welfare Economics/D.D6.D63 - Equity Justice Inequality and Other Normative Criteria and MeasurementJEL : H - Public Economics/H.H2 - Taxation Subsidies and Revenue/H.H2.H23 - Externalities • Redistributive Effects • Environmental Taxes and Subsidies[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceJEL : I - Health Education and Welfare/I.I3 - Welfare Well-Being and Poverty/I.I3.I32 - Measurement and Analysis of PovertyJEL: I - Health Education and Welfare/I.I3 - Welfare Well-Being and Poverty/I.I3.I32 - Measurement and Analysis of PovertyJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D6 - Welfare Economics/D.D6.D63 - Equity Justice Inequality and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
researchProduct

The three wives problem and Shapley value

2015

We examine the Talmudic three wives problem, which is a generalization of the Talmudic contested garment problem solved by Aumann and Maschler (1985) using coalitional procedure. This problem has many practical applications. In an attempt to unify all Talmudic methods, Guiasu (2010, 2011) asserts that it can be explained in terms of “run-to-the-bank”, that is, of Shapley value in a “cumulative game”. It can be challenged because the coalitional procedure yields the same result as the nucleolus, which corresponds to a “dual game”. As Guiasu's solution is paradoxical (it has all the appearances of truth), my contribution consists in explaining the concepts, particularly truncation, that play …

game theoryEconomics and EconometricsSociology and Political SciencePhilosophyJEL : B - History of Economic Thought Methodology and Heterodox Approaches/B.B4 - Economic MethodologyJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D71 - Social Choice • Clubs • Committees • Associations[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceShapley valueJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D3 - Distribution/D.D3.D31 - Personal Income Wealth and Their DistributionsJEL: B - History of Economic Thought Methodology and Heterodox Approaches/B.B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925PhilosophyThree WivesJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D6 - Welfare Economics/D.D6.D63 - Equity Justice Inequality and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and financesShapley valueJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making/D.D7.D71 - Social Choice • Clubs • Committees • AssociationsJEL: B - History of Economic Thought Methodology and Heterodox Approaches/B.B4 - Economic MethodologyTalmudic division[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceHumanitiesJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D3 - Distribution/D.D3.D31 - Personal Income Wealth and Their DistributionsJEL : B - History of Economic Thought Methodology and Heterodox Approaches/B.B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925Social Sciences (miscellaneous)Contested GarmentJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D6 - Welfare Economics/D.D6.D63 - Equity Justice Inequality and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
researchProduct

The paradox of endogenous poverty line in the poverty indices

2007

february 23-25, 2007; When measuring poverty, the poverty line is considered to be relatively determined as a percentage of the median income or as a percentage of the average income so as to allow international comparisons. The poverty line relative to the median income may be described as endogenous in contrast with the poverty line relative to the average income which may be described as exogenous because it is independent of the normalized distribution of incomes. As the existing literature is focused on the properties of the indices but not on the respective interest of the endogenous and exogenous poverty lines, this paper compares the two definitions of the relative poverty. The Rela…

poverty linepovertypoverty indexesJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D6 - Welfare Economics/D.D6.D63 - Equity Justice Inequality and Other Normative Criteria and Measurementmedian[ SHS.ECO ] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economies and finances[SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance[SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and FinanceJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D3 - Distribution/D.D3.D31 - Personal Income Wealth and Their DistributionsJEL : I - Health Education and Welfare/I.I3 - Welfare Well-Being and Poverty/I.I3.I32 - Measurement and Analysis of PovertyJEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D3 - Distribution/D.D3.D31 - Personal Income Wealth and Their DistributionsJEL : D - Microeconomics/D.D6 - Welfare Economics/D.D6.D63 - Equity Justice Inequality and Other Normative Criteria and MeasurementJEL: I - Health Education and Welfare/I.I3 - Welfare Well-Being and Poverty/I.I3.I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
researchProduct